Principally the submitted manuscripts are considered by us for the affirmation of the standard and the extent of the journal. In the event that any submitted article neglects to satisfy essential standard, the equivalent is dismissed and the choice is imparted to the author immediately. On the off chance that the editors are fulfilled, they will choose at least two commentators for point by point thought of the piece. If there should arise an occurrence of difference between analysts, the issue is settled by the Chief Editor. We evaluate the submitted manuscripts following Double Blind Peer Review.
Paper submitted by Author |
|
Author receives Paper Index by Email & SMS |
|
Screen by the Editor with Softwares |
|
Primary Review by the Chief Editor an initial quality/relevance assessment - Revised/Reject (if necessary) |
|
Chief Editor selects reviewers who are experts in the field of your research problem |
|
Invitation to Reviewers |
|
Paper will be send to Reviewers for evaluation |
|
Reviewers will review the paper and provide the comments (if any) to Chief Editor. |
|
Reviewers will recommend that: Accepted/Revision/Rejected |
|
If paper is Accepted without any modification, |
|
Publication |
|
If Revision requires, Authors can make revisions according to the comments of reviewers. |
|
Submission of Revised Paper |
|
Chief Editor makes a publication decision based on the comments compared with submitted paper. |
|
Publication |